Redundant to have a lecturer in this course when all he does is read from the slides. Very limited coverage apart from NPV, lack of practical examples, ridiculously easy quizzes that anybody could pass without paying much attention to the video lectures. Disappointing from Wharton as opposed to the rest of the courses in this business specialization that they offer.

I'm not sure about this, but is the course incomplete? I heard the Prof mentioning that he would go into cost of capital but the last video lecture ended with return on investments. Rather strange. Explanations were rather short and it was rather difficult to follow how the formulae worked. Perhaps the content needs to be spaced out a little.

The questions in their assessment are very flawed. Students reflected the problem on the forum for months but the questions and answer options never got changed. I don't really understand the rationale behind this (as I see that there are official replies on some of the feedback in the forum but just never fix the issue)...

Too many questions on the quizzes (when you total them across all weeks) either contained the wrong example of the formulas to use or did not have the correct answer amongst the options. This was the first (I have one more plus the capstone) Wharton class that had me questioning my purchase.

The subject material is fascinating but the method of presentation by the professor is extremely dry. I wish this course was more extensive like Dr. Schiller's Financial Markets course at Yale. He manages to bring to life complex financial concepts in a way that is both enlightening and fun.

Bad teacher, couldnt understand what he was saying,wasn't giving full information and was writing really bad i had to go on youtube to understand the things he was explaining ,everytime.

It is definitely not an introductory course. It is way too advanced and does not teach the basics. The course was just too much into formulas.

The course is supposed to be aimed at beginners in corporate finance, yet as a beginner, I found it very hard to follow.

The course tests have flaws and the course is a bit easy in comparison to the other courses in the specialization.

information was very basic and course materials average quizzes had many errors and very basic wouldnt recommend

No alternative for me to understand where I went wrong after giving the test. Not enough examples.

Just focused in 1 issue: NPV. Not focusing in sensibility analysis

the quizes provided wrong multiple choice answers

zero its not well prproer videos and stuff

no name on certificates

no certificate

money monster

m